"Following Directions" - May 14, 2021
-
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2019 11:42 pm
I always look at the reviews posted on crosswordfiend.com first to see how those experts solve the meta. Today's explanation by Conrad (who has been subbing for Laura B. lately) was excellent. His path was very similar to mine in that he tried the compass direction letters (NSEW) first and when that didn't work, he tried the body relevant letters (UDRL). He went to bed when neither path worked. (It took me two days to think to use the latter letters! ) He also suggested checking frequency analysis of each letter. I found these words in his summation fascinating:
"My mistake was assuming that compass and body relative letters were mutually exclusive. I find it interesting how we invent imaginary meta rules and then struggle (and sometimes fail) to solve the meta as a result."
That was EXACTLY what I did. Something in my brain made me assume that it was an either/or type of mechanism and I never made the leap to do both. Obviously I belong in Conrad's "sometimes fail" grouping, but I learned a lot from this one and hope to be able to apply that knowledge the next time I need it!!
"My mistake was assuming that compass and body relative letters were mutually exclusive. I find it interesting how we invent imaginary meta rules and then struggle (and sometimes fail) to solve the meta as a result."
That was EXACTLY what I did. Something in my brain made me assume that it was an either/or type of mechanism and I never made the leap to do both. Obviously I belong in Conrad's "sometimes fail" grouping, but I learned a lot from this one and hope to be able to apply that knowledge the next time I need it!!
Sara
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 6:50 pm
- Richard
- Posts: 352
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:06 pm
I did not get it and am not sure how to rate it.
I do congratulate Matt on the construction.
I had the basic idea figured out but did not focus on the ONE. I did see the word ENDS and was trying to end up there.
Was also trying to make words out of the path. I probably should have given that up and tried something else.
Even seeing the correct solution its not something that causes me say "AHA", Would have to work through all the directions in the starred words without making a mistake and then getting the answer. More work to me than mental insight.
Feel like I did not spend enough time on it to get it but probably spent more time on it than warranted.
I do congratulate Matt on the construction.
I had the basic idea figured out but did not focus on the ONE. I did see the word ENDS and was trying to end up there.
Was also trying to make words out of the path. I probably should have given that up and tried something else.
Even seeing the correct solution its not something that causes me say "AHA", Would have to work through all the directions in the starred words without making a mistake and then getting the answer. More work to me than mental insight.
Feel like I did not spend enough time on it to get it but probably spent more time on it than warranted.
-
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2020 11:25 am
- Location: Florida
Congratulations to the solvers! I was on another planet entirely and fell into the “mask” and “rna” rabbit holes—and that was just for starters. Another lesson learned: just because a clue is asterisked, that doesn’t mean it must be part of the ultimate answer.
“I cannot and will not cut my conscience to fit this year’s fashions”. Lillian Hellman
- MikeM000
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2020 11:31 am
- Location: Metro Detroit
Joe Ross wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 9:29 amI stopped watching British baking shows when Nigella Lawson's dresses akin to 'Lucille's', in Cool Hand Luke, became less promulent.Bird Lives wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 9:22 amIt's not my coinage. You've been watching the wrong TV shows. This wasn't on British Bake-Off.(Push the slider to 0:50 if you're in a hurry). Or just read the top of the screen.
.
Do you mean cromulent? Or is "promulent" a made-up word like "enstolen"?
- HunterX
- Posts: 1197
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:17 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
"King Me!" was one of my favorites. And this one is joining it. I guess I like the visual part of it?camandsampowercouple wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 9:30 amOmg I remember that puzzle destroying me all weekendboharr wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 8:50 amMike's done this before. On the RICHARD III puzzle, once I figured out what to do, I didn't know where to begin. After looking at the grid for what seemed like hours, I saw the word START sitting right there toward the bottom. Duh. Lesson learned. When he uses the word "start," listen up.
I like hearing how different methods (e.g. spreadsheet, paper) helped others follow the directions. King Me was what sold me on using my iPad. And this one was no exception.
- HunterX
- Posts: 1197
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:17 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
My math-major daughter indicated something about how using the axially symmetrical clues plus a middle one made it impossible to hit the bottom right corner due to the odd number of total directions. You need a net of 15 to the right and 15 down to get there
I just took their word for it.
-
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2021 7:26 pm
Or sign.sharkicicles wrote: ↑Fri May 14, 2021 1:17 amwell, if it was near the urinals, that probably would not have been the cleanest rest stop in the country.
- auee89
- Posts: 1123
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2021 10:55 am
- Location: Indiana
[/quote]
"King Me!" was one of my favorites. And this one is joining it. I guess I like the visual part of it?
I like hearing how different methods (e.g. spreadsheet, paper) helped others follow the directions. King Me was what sold me on using my iPad. And this one was no exception.
Directions.png
[/quote]
I like using my iPad as well. Here is an early iteration of my meandering. No clue how I arrived at this pattern . Although, I would turn left or right depending on the direction I was traveling - as if on a road and not necessarily going left and right on the grid.
"King Me!" was one of my favorites. And this one is joining it. I guess I like the visual part of it?
I like hearing how different methods (e.g. spreadsheet, paper) helped others follow the directions. King Me was what sold me on using my iPad. And this one was no exception.
Directions.png
[/quote]
I like using my iPad as well. Here is an early iteration of my meandering. No clue how I arrived at this pattern . Although, I would turn left or right depending on the direction I was traveling - as if on a road and not necessarily going left and right on the grid.
Kevin
- Joe Ross
- Moderator
- Posts: 5144
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:46 am
- Location: Cincinnati
You are correct! I misheared "cromulent" as "promulent."
- KayW
- Moderator
- Posts: 3397
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 12:10 am
- Location: Chicago
That reminds me! While I was stuck on using only the NSEW directions, I MEANDERed through Past WSJ Crossword Contests and Solutions - looking only at the puzzles created by Mike/Marie. I saw enough previous puzzles using that mechanism to convince me I was on the right path and just needed to tweak my application somehow.
Many thanks again to @Joe Ross @steveb and anyone else involved in assembling all those puzzles in one place. Looking at a collection of a particular constructor's puzzles is a great way for me to achieve a sort of meta mind meld with that constructor's approaches.
Contest Crosswords Combating Cancer (CCCC) is a bundle of 16 metapuzzles created to help raise money for cancer-related charities. It is available at CrosswordsForCancer.com.
- DrTom
- Posts: 3874
- Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2019 6:46 pm
- Location: Jacksonville, FL
Yes, what he said. When it comes to math I have nothing to add that would not subtract from the discussion. Besides I am sure the discussions would multiply and probably be divided. It's just a sine of our diversity...but I'm getting off on a tangent. Wait what is that large boat on the horizon, oh, not to worry its an arc.HunterX wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 11:21 amMy math-major daughter indicated something about how using the axially symmetrical clues plus a middle one made it impossible to hit the bottom right corner due to the odd number of total directions. You need a net of 15 to the right and 15 down to get there
I just took their word for it.
NUDGES!I am always willing to give nudges where needed; metas should be about fun, not frustration. Send me what you have done so far because often you are closer than you think!
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2020 1:33 pm
I failed, but gave it a rating of 3.5. I saw 13D (helping not at all) and noted all the E's, S's, N's and D's, but only one W. I was looking for the north, south, east and west but could not make sense of it. A nimbler mind (say 3.6 out of 5) could get there, but it escaped me (a <3.5 mind)..zacmoretz wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 10:48 amTotally agree. Everyone who doesn’t solve it, make sure you rate it as well each week!
I am a man of few...
- HunterX
- Posts: 1197
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:17 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
By my calculus, too many math puns and you will loose your associative properties. Your friends will be null.DrTom wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 12:12 pmYes, what he said. When it comes to math I have nothing to add that would not subtract from the discussion. Besides I am sure the discussions would multiply and probably be divided. It's just a sine of our diversity...but I'm getting off on a tangent. Wait what is that large boat on the horizon, oh, not to worry its an arc.HunterX wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 11:21 amMy math-major daughter indicated something about how using the axially symmetrical clues plus a middle one made it impossible to hit the bottom right corner due to the odd number of total directions. You need a net of 15 to the right and 15 down to get there
I just took their word for it.
- ajk
- Posts: 988
- Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2020 4:22 pm
- Location: Colorado
lol had the right starting place and the right mechanism and still managed to miss it somehow. Was distracted by visiting family. Still. Had literally everything, and pretty sure I tried it more than once
Check out this very cool project by many of your favorite muggles to raise money to fight cancer. You get a fun puzzle bundle and good causes get $. Win-win: Crosswords for Cancer
- mheberlingx100
- Posts: 532
- Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2019 11:39 am
I did the same thing. Worked all the steps twice and got gibberish. It wasn’t until I talked through with my sister-in-law (who tried it and followed directions properly) that I realized the mechanism was right but the solver (me) was flawed.
- whimsy
- Posts: 2835
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 9:51 am
- Location: Hopkinton MA
A lot of the above for me also --- had all the right parts, but my main problem was thinking there had to be a difference between North and Up, East and Right etc. --- possibly one meant one square only while the other meant proceed to the end of the word, or row? And the black squares or not conundrum too. It began to feel too tedious, and reminded me of the adding that Thousand Islands required!Richard wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 11:09 am I did not get it......
I had the basic idea figured out........
Was also trying to make words out of the path.....
Even seeing the correct solution its not something that causes me say "AHA", Would have to work through all the directions in the starred words without making a mistake and then getting the answer. More work to me than mental insight......
But I will say that this was an amazing treasure hunt of a construction! Congrats to Mike for creating it, and to all who stuck with it!
-
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2020 10:03 pm
- HunterX
- Posts: 1197
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:17 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Dammit...!
Uh... I mean... um... CONGRATULATIONS!
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 12:00 pm
Not for beginners. I put my thinking-cap on, but some evil launderer had bleached out the grey matter. Congrats to those who got it.