Page 1 of 1

WSJ Acrostic -- October 24, 2020

Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2020 7:14 pm
by ChrisKochmanski
I intended to print this one, but the PDF wouldn't download, so I tried it online. I'm not wild about acrostics in print -- all that double entering, with me making many mistakes. I do them, but sometimes reluctantly. This is the first time I've tried an acrostic online, with the single entering and other helpful features. Fun! And I completed it in just over 16 minutes, which has to be an acrostic record for me.

Re: WSJ Acrostic -- October 24, 2020

Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2020 7:21 pm
by Meg
ChrisKochmanski wrote: Fri Oct 23, 2020 7:14 pm I intended to print this one, but the PDF wouldn't download, so I tried it online. I'm not wild about acrostics in print -- all that double entering, with me making many mistakes. I do them, but sometimes reluctantly. This is the first time I've tried an acrostic online, with the single entering and other helpful features. Fun! And I completed it in just over 16 minutes, which has to be an acrostic record for me.
I’ve NEVER done an acrostic in 16 minutes. Way to go!

Re: WSJ Acrostic -- October 24, 2020

Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2020 9:50 pm
by boharr
ChrisKochmanski wrote: Fri Oct 23, 2020 7:14 pm I intended to print this one, but the PDF wouldn't download, so I tried it online. I'm not wild about acrostics in print -- all that double entering, with me making many mistakes. I do them, but sometimes reluctantly. This is the first time I've tried an acrostic online, with the single entering and other helpful features. Fun! And I completed it in just over 16 minutes, which has to be an acrostic record for me.
16 minutes! I could hardly even have typed it that fast with the answers all given to me.

Re: WSJ Acrostic -- October 24, 2020

Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2020 2:00 pm
by Jace54
Solving this puzzle without Google helped make up for failing at this week’s meta. I only had L, O, Q, and S after the first run through the clues so it was not promising, but my possible answer for B appeared to fit and I tried an answer for T that I knew used a stage name. That answer really helped, and then the answer to F provided the next key step to eventually fill in the rest.

I like other variety puzzles better but am gradually warming up to acrostics.

Re: WSJ Acrostic -- October 24, 2020

Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2020 10:42 pm
by ChrisKochmanski
Meg wrote: Fri Oct 23, 2020 7:21 pm
ChrisKochmanski wrote: Fri Oct 23, 2020 7:14 pm I intended to print this one, but the PDF wouldn't download, so I tried it online. I'm not wild about acrostics in print -- all that double entering, with me making many mistakes. I do them, but sometimes reluctantly. This is the first time I've tried an acrostic online, with the single entering and other helpful features. Fun! And I completed it in just over 16 minutes, which has to be an acrostic record for me.
I’ve NEVER done an acrostic in 16 minutes. Way to go!
I'll be the first to say, I had NEVER solved an acrostic -- WSJ, NYT, or otherwise -- in 16 minutes before. My guess is that it was just one of those things. Unusually, I knew quite a few of the answers Mike S. was looking for, and my guesses here and there mostly proved correct. Kinda like what this guy did -- https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/ ... s-baseball -- but I swear I was NOT on acid!

Re: WSJ Acrostic -- October 24, 2020

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:57 pm
by mokelfish
The recent string of WSJ acrostics have been really impressive. Really enjoy doing them online (as opposed to in print).

Re: WSJ Acrostic -- October 24, 2020

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2020 2:38 pm
by MikeM000
Thanks for posting this; I did not know they had acrostics in the WSJ until just now...I do them bi-weekly with my NYT crossword subscription. 16 minutes is an excellent time; I think there was one in the NYT a year or 2 back that was all Chuck Berry themed that I got in about 10 but those are special cases...