Page 2 of 2

Re: #70 - "Reduction Potential"

Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 4:49 pm
by Laura M
Pretty sure I'm on the right track now, but still can't see the finish line...

Re: #70 - "Reduction Potential"

Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 8:46 pm
by boharr
Got it, with the help of some major shoves.

Re: #70 - "Reduction Potential"

Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 11:57 pm
by Laura M
Oh man I had it this morning but I didn't see why! This is fantastic.

Re: #70 - "Reduction Potential"

Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2020 2:20 pm
by Hector
Big plus-sized nothing so far. I'd had a good few weeks & was due for a comeuppance. :)

Re: #70 - "Reduction Potential"

Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2020 12:01 am
by Tina
I got nothing. Science is not my strong point.

Re: #70 - "Reduction Potential"

Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2020 7:16 pm
by Cindy N
I've got something. First step led to second. Can't cross the finish line.

Re: #70 - "Reduction Potential"

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 2:14 pm
by joequavis
Just saw Peter's write-up. I was off on a pretty good, but sort of related tangent. I found words which were possibly loosely hinted at by the theme entries, and those words contained a subset of the letters in its respective theme entry: NON-RECURRENT --> UNE; CAPITALISTIC --> SCRIP; INCONSISTENCIES --> NONSENSE; NON-PERTINENT --> INAPT; ANTI-AIRCRAFT --> CAR.

Many of these actually crossed the theme entry I paired them with. I was certain I was on the right path, but of course could not come up with anything. I wish I could have gotten off this path and noticed the intended path. Would have been enjoyable to solve, even if I wasn't an engineer! Cool puzzle!

Re: #70 - "Reduction Potential"

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 5:45 pm
by Laura M
Part of the reason this one took me so long was that I was totally 100% positive that if PGW put both (NONRE)CURRENT and AMP in the grid, it must be significant!

Re: #70 - "Reduction Potential"

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 9:00 pm
by C=64
KAS 5 -- I gave it a decent attempt but I'm glad I gave up when I did. I saw ION in a few places and thought we might be dealing with electrical charges, but that (obviously) was a terminal path that didn't lead anywhere.

Re: #70 - "Reduction Potential"

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 10:01 pm
by Hector
Speaking of terminals, the NW and NE corners had AN and CAT, kinda joined by CURRENT. And . . . dozens of other wrong approaches. I don't super like the title, but it's a great meta, as I've come to accept after digesting my sour grapes. :)

Re: #70 - "Reduction Potential"

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 10:45 pm
by Laura M
joequavis wrote: Tue Jul 28, 2020 2:14 pm Just saw Peter's write-up. I was off on a pretty good, but sort of related tangent. I found words which were possibly loosely hinted at by the theme entries, and those words contained a subset of the letters in its respective theme entry: NON-RECURRENT --> UNE; CAPITALISTIC --> SCRIP; INCONSISTENCIES --> NONSENSE; NON-PERTINENT --> INAPT; ANTI-AIRCRAFT --> CAR.

Many of these actually crossed the theme entry I paired them with. I was certain I was on the right path, but of course could not come up with anything. I wish I could have gotten off this path and noticed the intended path. Would have been enjoyable to solve, even if I wasn't an engineer! Cool puzzle!
I had those too! (Except UNE, that's a good one.) The crossing NON-PERTINENT/INAPT in particular seemed like it had to mean something! Lots of rabbit holes. What finally broke it for me was thinking that you could get a lot of anagrams out of the long words, and because I'm terrible at those I plugged NONRECURRENT into a Scrabble word generator and remembered "counter" from one of the clues. Not sure if this was intentional, but it helped that for all of the relevant clue words, I'd had to work a little to make the connection to the answer so they ended up sticking in my head for later.

It feels random that I managed to solve this one, I could have very easily missed it. Some days you get the meta, some days the meta gets you :-)

Re: #70 - "Reduction Potential"

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 11:21 pm
by Cindy N
With a nudge, I did get this one. Not my cup of tea.