MGWCC #821 — "Read That Back To Me"
- Cinny
- Posts: 829
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2020 2:53 pm
- Location: Minoa, NY
- Contact:
- Jeremy Smith
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:45 pm
- Location: Tampa Bay area
- Meg
- Posts: 2183
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 1:41 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL
- SJMcK
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2022 12:45 pm
- Location: Stockbridge, GA
- Contact:
- KayW
- Moderator
- Posts: 3366
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 12:10 am
- Location: Chicago
Beamed. At last, we have a week 2!
Contest Crosswords Combating Cancer (CCCC) is a bundle of 16 metapuzzles created to help raise money for cancer-related charities. It is available at CrosswordsForCancer.com.
- DCBilly
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2021 4:40 pm
- Location: Washington DC
- ChrisKochmanski
- Posts: 2225
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:51 pm
- Location: Saline, Michigan
- rjy
- Posts: 1050
- Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2021 12:52 pm
- Location: Gaithersburg, MD
- HunterX
- Posts: 1194
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:17 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Awaiting the transporter beam. Kept thinking, "He must have, once again, made it a lot harder than he thinks." Until I realized he didn't.
- mattythewsjpuzzler
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2020 11:47 am
Beamed! Yes def week 2-ish. Thank God February only has 29 days this month!
- woozy
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2020 12:40 am
Easy just means too much information. Maybe there's a message here in all this spaghetti but its going to take a lot more patience to see and than I seem to have right now.
And there is a *lot* of spaghetti....
And there is a *lot* of spaghetti....
I guess I should change my signature, and start promoting this meta: Hungry Little Creature. I was going to sent it to people for testing but I dropped the ball on it.
-
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2020 11:09 am
Metas are funny things, aren't they?
When you first start solving, the biggest challenge is that you have no tools in the tool box - both an empty set and, yet, an infinite set, of possible solving mechanisms.
But then... the more experience you gain, the fuller the toolbox. No matter how simple the metanism, you immediately reach for the hydraulic torque wrench, or, worse, the grid obliterating chainsaw. I desperately apply differential equations, when a flat head screwdriver, or a $2 calculator are the only tools needed to solve.
On a related note, am I the only one with a scary collection of unidentifiable tools that were purchased, by absolute need, 20 years ago, but you no longer have any idea what they do, or why you wasted the money on them, especially given that it was very likely, when you bought them, that you would be staring blankly at them, twenty years down the road?
No, I don't, either. I was just asking.
When you first start solving, the biggest challenge is that you have no tools in the tool box - both an empty set and, yet, an infinite set, of possible solving mechanisms.
But then... the more experience you gain, the fuller the toolbox. No matter how simple the metanism, you immediately reach for the hydraulic torque wrench, or, worse, the grid obliterating chainsaw. I desperately apply differential equations, when a flat head screwdriver, or a $2 calculator are the only tools needed to solve.
On a related note, am I the only one with a scary collection of unidentifiable tools that were purchased, by absolute need, 20 years ago, but you no longer have any idea what they do, or why you wasted the money on them, especially given that it was very likely, when you bought them, that you would be staring blankly at them, twenty years down the road?
No, I don't, either. I was just asking.
- ship4u
- Posts: 947
- Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2021 7:00 am
- Location: At Wit's End, Shaker Heights, Ohio
- Contact:
On the board. Is it time for a Smithwick's yet?
Don & Cynthia
We are always happy to get to know other muggles and help in any way! PM's are always welcome. The next best thing to winning a mug is helping a fellow muggle win a mug!
We are always happy to get to know other muggles and help in any way! PM's are always welcome. The next best thing to winning a mug is helping a fellow muggle win a mug!
- MikeyG
- Posts: 1421
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2020 2:52 pm
- Location: Chicago
- Contact:
Separable, or ordinary with an integrating factor?
- lbray53
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2020 8:34 am
- Location: Elkhorn, WI
Exactly.Bird Lives wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 2:38 pm Wihtout [redacted], unsolvable. With it, a Week 1 or 1.5. I had to go to the OED to confirm.
Submitted one minute after update but confident.
EDIT: Beamed!
Last edited by lbray53 on Sat Feb 24, 2024 5:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My avatar proves that it is sometimes better to be lucky than good!
- woozy
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2020 12:40 am
I appreciate the nudge. I was getting nowhere without it. That really seems a bit too much of a spoiler. (That said I haven't had a time to figure it out although I see that *really* explains something.Bird Lives wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 2:38 pm Wihtout [redacted], unsolvable. With it, a Week 1 or 1.5. I had to go to the OED to confirm.
I guess I should change my signature, and start promoting this meta: Hungry Little Creature. I was going to sent it to people for testing but I dropped the ball on it.
-
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2020 11:09 am
Depends on my mood, the time of day, and the most common letter in the title of the puzzle. For this one, for example, with 3 Ts and 3As, I attempted to model the solution with a stochastic partial differential equation.
Is that how you would have tackled it?
- woozy
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2020 12:40 am
Okay. If it's what I submitted it's either a 1 or a 4 depending on one's ability to think outside the box... way outside the box.
I can't and would never have gotten it had it not been for an inadvertent comment. So I'm calling it a 4.
I can't and would never have gotten it had it not been for an inadvertent comment. So I'm calling it a 4.
I guess I should change my signature, and start promoting this meta: Hungry Little Creature. I was going to sent it to people for testing but I dropped the ball on it.
- MikeyG
- Posts: 1421
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2020 2:52 pm
- Location: Chicago
- Contact:
I must concede that I only know how to do separable ones, so you have one up on me! (The time when differential equations was offered, I started hewing more toward actuarial courses, so I actually evaded this one!)HoldThatThought wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2024 5:47 pmDepends on my mood, the time of day, and the most common letter in the title of the puzzle. For this one, for example, with 3 Ts and 3As, I attempted to model the solution with a stochastic partial differential equation.
Is that how you would have tackled it?
So much is like that at times! This week's WSJ is a great example, I think, of one that can go either way in terms of difficulty.
- woozy
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2020 12:40 am
I really had a hard time with the WSJ. I'd like to say I had a harder time then I should have had but ... I wasn't going to get it. In that one though, it's not a matter of thinking outside the box; it's a matter of thinking inside the correct boxes.... And they just weren't the boxes I really swim in (I love the smell of mixed metaphors in the morning).
I guess I should change my signature, and start promoting this meta: Hungry Little Creature. I was going to sent it to people for testing but I dropped the ball on it.