Two woozy ones: Considering every factor (a legitimate meta) ... and .... I lead you to the answer (you were warned)
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2024 7:43 pm
So... I have two meta.
First one is legitimate and a fairly decent straight forward one:
Considering every factor
The answer to the meta is a type of question that considers every factor
This one should be fun. Although I probably made it too easy to guess. It was hard to clue the metanisms so that they weren't just spelled out or ridiculously hidden.
(The image is the score to Charles Ives "The unanswered question")
ARGGHHHH! A very severe error. Maybe fixable. Maybe not.
Oh, well. Just have a laugh at this other one I made which was me carrying a joke too far.
....
And this one......
I lead you to the answer
The meta is something you shouldn't feed a crocodile
I warned you I'd do this!
But don't worry. Just have fun and don't take it seriously.
I warned you I'd do this!
First one is legitimate and a fairly decent straight forward one:
Considering every factor
The answer to the meta is a type of question that considers every factor
This one should be fun. Although I probably made it too easy to guess. It was hard to clue the metanisms so that they weren't just spelled out or ridiculously hidden.
(The image is the score to Charles Ives "The unanswered question")
ARGGHHHH! A very severe error. Maybe fixable. Maybe not.
Oh, well. Just have a laugh at this other one I made which was me carrying a joke too far.
....
And this one......
I lead you to the answer
The meta is something you shouldn't feed a crocodile
I warned you I'd do this!
But don't worry. Just have fun and don't take it seriously.
I warned you I'd do this!