“Boxing Day” by HEX — WSJ, 12/17/22

Enter if you dare!
Post Reply
User avatar
ChrisKochmanski
Posts: 2199
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:51 pm
Location: Saline, Michigan

“Boxing Day” by HEX — WSJ, 12/17/22

#1

Post by ChrisKochmanski »

Once I got going on this one, it rolled, BUT … it took me a while, with some looking up of synonyms, to get the foothold I needed.

Fun!
Jace54
Posts: 502
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2020 7:38 pm
Location: Iowa

#2

Post by Jace54 »

That was a fun solve! I also took awhile to get a foothold but finally got it in the bottom right.
User avatar
oldjudge
Posts: 1636
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2019 4:16 am
Location: Pasadena, CA

#3

Post by oldjudge »

I agree with Chris. The toughest part, which wasn’t very tough, was filling in the first few answers. It wasn’t that the clues were a lot easier after that, but with a cross or two they became pretty simple. Fun puzzle though. I miss the Cox and Rathvon Saturday CNP cryptics. Hopefully, they start a Patreon site.
Barney
Posts: 911
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2020 4:12 pm

#4

Post by Barney »

The dearth of entries here probably says something.
User avatar
KayW
Moderator
Posts: 3277
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 12:10 am
Location: Chicago

#5

Post by KayW »

When I first looked at this, I thought "There's NO WAY I'll get a foothold here!" since you pretty much have to get a solid start at either end. But lo and behold - it all fell into place fairly quickly. My start was in bottom right as well.

Another amazing one from HEX.
Contest Crosswords Combating Cancer (CCCC) is a bundle of 16 metapuzzles created to help raise money for cancer-related charities. It is available at CrosswordsForCancer.com.
User avatar
ChrisKochmanski
Posts: 2199
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:51 pm
Location: Saline, Michigan

#6

Post by ChrisKochmanski »

Do you think that HEX intentionally made the beginning and ending clues and answers more obscure than usual (for them) to make the foothold harder to get? Because once I got the foothold, things rolled pretty smoothly from there.
User avatar
Guffman
Posts: 194
Joined: Tue May 18, 2021 10:02 am
Location: Prairie Village, Kansas

#7

Post by Guffman »

A much longer than usual solve for me. Getting enough early entries was the challenge. Finding the "gift" about 2/3 of the way through helped me fill in the SE quadrant. Also got a bit dizzy from the back-and-forth lines. Not complaining, though. A completely fair and interesting cryptic as always.
User avatar
oldjudge
Posts: 1636
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2019 4:16 am
Location: Pasadena, CA

#8

Post by oldjudge »

ChrisKochmanski wrote: Sun Dec 18, 2022 10:52 am Do you think that HEX intentionally made the beginning and ending clues and answers more obscure than usual (for them) to make the foothold harder to get? Because once I got the foothold, things rolled pretty smoothly from there.
I’m not sure they did. I found the end clues easy and, although there were some tougher middle ones, having crosses makes your life a LOT easier.
Jeanrosz
Posts: 311
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 1:16 pm
Location: New Richmond ohio

#9

Post by Jeanrosz »

Loved it. Took a while to get started but I carried on..
User avatar
Bird Lives
Posts: 2693
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 6:43 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

#10

Post by Bird Lives »

I forgot to look at this till someone on the Zoom mentioned it last night. Like others, I got stumped by the opening. But once I started going backwards from the end, there were no bumps.

I'm unfamiliar with the term HEX. Is it for Henry and Elizabeth CoX?
Jay
User avatar
iggystan
Posts: 303
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2021 5:39 pm

#11

Post by iggystan »

Jace54 wrote: Fri Dec 16, 2022 6:26 pm That was a fun solve! I also took awhile to get a foothold but finally got it in the bottom right.
That was my foothold as well. Once I started there, everything fell into place pretty quickly. Always love a good HEX cryptic.
Post Reply