You are right that it often (but not always) helps to look atPhysics3phd wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 8:36 am I’m a newbie, I am clueless as to how one is supposed to know which letters to pick to look at. The pattern was ABC…. But large words were left out. Trying to swim ashore, but lost at sea.
- long entries, particularly horizontal, particularly symmetric locations, and particularly similar structures
- the central entry, particularly horizontal
- the upper left and bottom right entries (first and last across, first and last down)
- any clues with asterisks
- any clues, often the last across, that have a parenthetical or extra comment/instruction ("the number that would be 11 if converted to binary" is an odd cluing for THREE that suggests converting to binary is important)
- all of the entries along each row (spanning black boxes)
In this case, the long entries didn't seem similar in structure (different parts of speech and word counts and some were vertical). There were no asterisks. FUNERAL at the center seemed to possible align with NEVER FORGET and CHURCH YARD. So I was juggling all these things when I noticed the first three entries started with ABC, and then had ZYX. That seemed forced , and it led to the solution.
But getting back to the other advice someone gave, practice and experience really help give you a basis for what is truly unusual (CXI? JQA?) and what is general creativity you see in a lot of puzzles (3 clues about blue, 3 clues about movies, 2 clues about school locations, etc). But after about 75 weeks (1.5 years) of me doing this, each meta is unique, so in a way every week is a new experience that previous experience may not help. Frustrating but fun. As others have pointed out, these past two weeks have been very unique and don't follow a lot of general rules.