"Less and Less" - August 21, 2020
-
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2020 11:05 am
- Location: Clearwater, Florida
Frustrated by how bad I am at these Meta puzzles!
I can fill in the grid in just a few minutes but then spend the rest of my weekend staring. Sure I looked at the six long clues, but I simply could not make the next leap. If I get 10% of these, I'm lucky.
Wallowing!
I can fill in the grid in just a few minutes but then spend the rest of my weekend staring. Sure I looked at the six long clues, but I simply could not make the next leap. If I get 10% of these, I'm lucky.
Wallowing!
-
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2020 2:38 pm
After the seeing her siblings' success at helping out with solving the metas over the past couple of weeks, my 12-year-old decided it was her turn. When she saw I was staring at the grid for a while and wasn't coming up with the solution, she took the filled-in grid and began looking for the theme entries. "What does innocous (sic) mean?" I told her to look it up.
With a bit of difficulty she took the new revised edition of Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language off the shelf, opened it up on her lap (cracked the spine – but hey, at least she opened the dictionary!), looked up the theme words one by one and haltingly read them out to me. I'll be the first to admit that her stumbling recitation of the definitions was far from clear. But I'll also say that my ear did catch the repeating "less" in most of those definitions. When she gave up looking for the answer twenty minutes later and gave the grid back to me, it didn't take me long to see it.
So no, she didn't quite get it this time, but she was instrumental in the solution. And she may have learned the meaning of a few (difficult) words too. Well done!
With a bit of difficulty she took the new revised edition of Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language off the shelf, opened it up on her lap (cracked the spine – but hey, at least she opened the dictionary!), looked up the theme words one by one and haltingly read them out to me. I'll be the first to admit that her stumbling recitation of the definitions was far from clear. But I'll also say that my ear did catch the repeating "less" in most of those definitions. When she gave up looking for the answer twenty minutes later and gave the grid back to me, it didn't take me long to see it.
So no, she didn't quite get it this time, but she was instrumental in the solution. And she may have learned the meaning of a few (difficult) words too. Well done!
- Wendy Walker
- Posts: 1757
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:44 pm
- Location: Unionville, PA
Oh my gosh, this brings back memories. That's exactly what my parents used to say to me! Well done, Schmeel!
Good luck, fellow Muggles!
-
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2019 7:43 pm
- Location: Duluth, MN
I also liked the shout-out to 9A. Although it belongs to another state, it’s closer to Minn. I agree with elan about keeping the beauty of the Lake Superior region a secret. Shhhhhh.
I did not get the meta this week. I just couldn’t put it together. Too busy looking at that beautiful lake.
- ReB
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2020 9:34 pm
- Location: East Tennessee
Another well-constructed puzzle.
So close and yet so far. I did try out various synonyms (and antonyms), but for some reason none of them contained a "LESS" - but now it's obvious. SAFE for INNOCUOUS, RISKY for FOOLHARDY, etc. Might have recognized the neighborhood had I spotted even one or two of the correct synonyms. Too many travel-related distractions this past weekend, perhaps.
Well, there'll soon be next week's... Zoom is doubtful this week due to travel.
So close and yet so far. I did try out various synonyms (and antonyms), but for some reason none of them contained a "LESS" - but now it's obvious. SAFE for INNOCUOUS, RISKY for FOOLHARDY, etc. Might have recognized the neighborhood had I spotted even one or two of the correct synonyms. Too many travel-related distractions this past weekend, perhaps.
Well, there'll soon be next week's... Zoom is doubtful this week due to travel.
- hunkra
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 6:35 pm
- Location: Hudson Valley, NY
I feel your pain. If I get how the title is connected to the mechanism, I almost always figure it out. But if that initial inspiration doesn't come, I never ultimately solve them. However, I am holding out hope that the longer I try, the more exposure I will get to the different meta mechanisms. I hadn't seen a synonym meta yet, so... now I know!mitchel674 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 8:42 am Frustrated by how bad I am at these Meta puzzles!
I can fill in the grid in just a few minutes but then spend the rest of my weekend staring. Sure I looked at the six long clues, but I simply could not make the next leap. If I get 10% of these, I'm lucky.
Wallowing!
Channeling Molly Weasley on a good day.
- SusieG
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2020 9:20 pm
- Location: Arkansas
Even with multiple nudges I wasn’t able to solve this. I will chalk it up to lack of sleep. I expected a path to solution like this one, but just couldn’t see it. Puzzle was clever, as are those of you who solved it!
- sphorning
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2019 4:24 pm
- Location: Steamboat Springs, CO
Even if the title had been "Add less" I would never have thought to find a synonym for the theme answers. Okay, maybe the title needed to be "Find similar and add less" something really in my face! LOL!
-
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 6:40 pm
- Location: Idaho
- TPS
- Posts: 721
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:19 pm
- Location: Florida
I was at exactly this spot a for about a year - then about 3 months ago - with a lot of help from people here - things started to click and I get about 1/2 of them now (but not w/o some long droughts). The one downside is I think I got worse at solving the Grid. I think it’s because now I rush to get to the meta so I am more inclined to google a clue than spend 15-20 minutes trying to puzzle it out.mitchel674 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 8:42 am Frustrated by how bad I am at these Meta puzzles!
I can fill in the grid in just a few minutes but then spend the rest of my weekend staring. Sure I looked at the six long clues, but I simply could not make the next leap. If I get 10% of these, I'm lucky.
Wallowing!
- TPS
- Posts: 721
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:19 pm
- Location: Florida
- Bird Lives
- Posts: 2839
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 6:43 pm
- Location: NYC
- Contact:
The nudge I gave to the few people who requested was "Both Sides Now" (or more indirectly "Joni Mitchell / Judy Collins"), suggesting the necessity of looking at both sides of the grid where the long entries were. It was not a very helpful nudge.
Last edited by Bird Lives on Mon Aug 24, 2020 10:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
Jay
-
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2020 10:03 pm
Not even close. My favorite thing I noticed in the grid was ORE IDA in 18 and 21 across. Is it something about tater tots? Who would want less tater tots? Congrats to the solvers!
- Joe Ross
- Moderator
- Posts: 5201
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:46 am
- Location: Cincinnati
Keep at it! Experience is necessary.mitchel674 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 8:42 am Frustrated by how bad I am at these Meta puzzles!
I can fill in the grid in just a few minutes but then spend the rest of my weekend staring. Sure I looked at the six long clues, but I simply could not make the next leap. If I get 10% of these, I'm lucky.
Wallowing!
Review several excellent solving techniques offered: Hints for Solving Meta Contests
Review past puzzles & solutions.
Understand that these WSJ Contest Crosswords are in their last month of their 5th year. Recent puzzles & their mechanisms are much more difficult than the first couple of years', including recent "easy" puzzles.
Share your progress & request verification & nudges from generous veterans. Pay attention to their techniques rather than each puzzle's final answer. Soon, you won't need verifications & nudges.
Further improve your skill by offering help to others. You'll be amazed at how this will improve your ability by having to explain the process - without giving away outright spoilers. This will force you to review logical steps to take in approaching all meta puzzles.
[EDIT1 following]
Dplass's Post #114 was an excellent gentle nudge, IMH&HO:
"...this mechanism [...] was used a LOT in 2019"
My nudge to the very few muggles who requested it of me via PM & to one who had immediately previously posted their need of one:
"review theme clues for awkwardness versus what is within grid"
Whole blood, platelets, or plasma: Donate 4 in 2024
PLATELET 𝗱𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗿𝗮𝗿𝗲.
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘀 ENORMOUS 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗲:
𝟰𝟬% 𝗽𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗰,
𝟯𝟬% 𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗰,
𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗿 & 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘂𝗺𝗮. 𝗣𝗟𝗘𝗔𝗦𝗘 𝗦𝗛𝗔𝗥𝗘!
PLATELET 𝗱𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗿𝗮𝗿𝗲.
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘀 ENORMOUS 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗲:
𝟰𝟬% 𝗽𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗰,
𝟯𝟬% 𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗰,
𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗿 & 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘂𝗺𝗮. 𝗣𝗟𝗘𝗔𝗦𝗘 𝗦𝗛𝗔𝗥𝗘!
- SusieG
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2020 9:20 pm
- Location: Arkansas
It makes perfect sense now! All was not lost. It gave me the opportunity to listen to both versions with my daughter and spurred an interesting discussion.Bird Lives wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 9:23 am The nudge I gave to the few people who requested was "Both Sides Now" (or more indirectly "Joni Mitchell / Judy Collins")to loo, suggesting the necessity of looking at both sides of the grid where the long entries were. It was not a very helpful nudge.
- Joe Ross
- Moderator
- Posts: 5201
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:46 am
- Location: Cincinnati
Best $5 ever spent (& at a yard sale, no less):Wendy Walker wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 8:51 amOh my gosh, this brings back memories. That's exactly what my parents used to say to me! Well done, Schmeel!
"Dad, how do you speel ____ ?" "Look it up in the big blue book!"
"Dad, what does ____ mean?" "Look it up in the big blue book!"
Last edited by Joe Ross on Mon Aug 24, 2020 10:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Whole blood, platelets, or plasma: Donate 4 in 2024
PLATELET 𝗱𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗿𝗮𝗿𝗲.
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘀 ENORMOUS 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗲:
𝟰𝟬% 𝗽𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗰,
𝟯𝟬% 𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗰,
𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗿 & 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘂𝗺𝗮. 𝗣𝗟𝗘𝗔𝗦𝗘 𝗦𝗛𝗔𝗥𝗘!
PLATELET 𝗱𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗿𝗮𝗿𝗲.
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘀 ENORMOUS 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗲:
𝟰𝟬% 𝗽𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗰,
𝟯𝟬% 𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗰,
𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗿 & 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘂𝗺𝗮. 𝗣𝗟𝗘𝗔𝗦𝗘 𝗦𝗛𝗔𝗥𝗘!
- TPS
- Posts: 721
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:19 pm
- Location: Florida
The nudge I gave was just the word “synonyms” - I didn’t know if that was too much or not - I think everyone I gave it to eventually solved it.
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2019 10:37 am
- Location: WA State
Thanks for the great advice, Joe! I am with mitchel674. I just don’t see this solutions. But I did figure out Wonder Twins a few months back. I really think it has to do with how our brains work. Sometimes our brains need to be taught new pathways.Joe Ross wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 9:34 amKeep at it! Experience is necessary.mitchel674 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 8:42 am Frustrated by how bad I am at these Meta puzzles!
I can fill in the grid in just a few minutes but then spend the rest of my weekend staring. Sure I looked at the six long clues, but I simply could not make the next leap. If I get 10% of these, I'm lucky.
Wallowing!
Review several excellent solving techniques offered: Hints for Solving Meta Contests
Review past puzzles & solutions.
Understand that these WSJ Contest Crosswords are in their last month of their 5th year. Recent puzzles & their mechanisms are much more difficult than the first couple of years', including recent "easy" puzzles.
Share your progress & request verification & nudges from generous veterans. Pay attention to their techniques rather than each puzzle's final answer. Soon, you won't need verifications & nudges.
Further improve your skill by offering help to others. You'll be amazed at how this will improve your ability by having to explain the process - without giving away outright spoilers. This will force you to review logical steps to take in approaching all meta puzzles.
[EDIT1 following]
Dplass's Post #114 was an excellent gentle nudge, IMH&HO:
"...this mechanism [...] was used a LOT in 2019"
My nudge to the very few muggles who requested it of me via PM & to one who had immediately previously posted their need of one:
"review theme clues for awkwardness versus what is within grid"
- Wendy Walker
- Posts: 1757
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:44 pm
- Location: Unionville, PA
I forgot to mention that I had a meta pre-dream on Wednesday night. In the dream I foolishly announced that I'd solved the meta -- then realized there was a part 2 to the puzzle, all in Spanish. One part even involved filling in letters on stepping stones across a creek.
Good luck, fellow Muggles!
- boharr
- Moderator
- Posts: 3262
- Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 8:57 am
- Location: Westchester, NY
AmenJeff S wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 2:40 amVanVeen wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 12:21 am
As with most of these, if you happen to "see" the mechanism (the tree in the forest), the puzzle is easy, and if you don't, it's terribly frustrating. It's often the "seeing" rather than the inherent difficulty of the puzzle that determines whether you solve it, and how long it takes you to do so.