#57 - "Preposition Cook"
- Hector
- Posts: 1297
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:15 pm
- Location: San Francisco
- Contact:
#57 - "Preposition Cook"
The answer to the metapuzzle is a word you might hear in a French restaurant.
- Hector
- Posts: 1297
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:15 pm
- Location: San Francisco
- Contact:
Solved (I think) with some back-solving.
A distinctive difficulty in pgw's metas is that grid entries that with other constructors would seem so unusual as to HAVE TO be part of the meta mechanism are just par for the course.
A distinctive difficulty in pgw's metas is that grid entries that with other constructors would seem so unusual as to HAVE TO be part of the meta mechanism are just par for the course.
- Cindy
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 5:39 pm
- Location: Matthews
- ChrisKochmanski
- Posts: 2455
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:51 pm
- Location: Saline, Michigan
- ChrisKochmanski
- Posts: 2455
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:51 pm
- Location: Saline, Michigan
Agree with Hector. Rarely in PGWCC do we find ONO, EPEE, OTT, ORR, EMU, GNU, etc., etc. That’s OK.
-
- Posts: 1450
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:49 am
-
- Posts: 1739
- Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2019 10:09 am
I'm not sure how to parse that.
Do you mean, "PGW has weird words in his grids that aren't part of the meta, but other constructors put weird words in the grid that ARE part of the meta?"
- Hector
- Posts: 1297
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:15 pm
- Location: San Francisco
- Contact:
Yes. Metas are more difficult to construct than plain crosswords (at least, themeless ones). So, often there will be clues, entries, or even just letters, that are to some extent forced---ones that the constructor would be unlikely to use in a plain puzzle. Spotting unusual, noteworthy content becomes part of the solving experience (why is THAT there?), and constructors play with that. What I meant is just that pgw's grids are so full of unusual, noteworthy content even apart from the meta mechanisms that you can rarely think, "Aha! That has to be part of the meta."
-
- Posts: 1739
- Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2019 10:09 am
Ah, I understand what you mean. Personally, I interpret that as a defect, requiring too much "mind reading". But I could understand how people consider it a challenge.Hector wrote: ↑Wed Apr 22, 2020 11:11 am Yes. Metas are more difficult to construct than plain crosswords (at least, themeless ones). So, often there will be clues, entries, or even just letters, that are to some extent forced---ones that the constructor would be unlikely to use in a plain puzzle. Spotting unusual, noteworthy content becomes part of the solving experience (why is THAT there?), and constructors play with that. What I meant is just that pgw's grids are so full of unusual, noteworthy content even apart from the meta mechanisms that you can rarely think, "Aha! That has to be part of the meta."
I find PGW's metas too frustrating and I'm probably going to Marie Kondo them.
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 5:24 pm
Not for me - I have no idea how anyone can possibly construct a good themeless. The constraints created by theme, or meta content, require creativity in filling the rest of the grid; a blank slate would be incredibly intimidating to me.
The reason for this is mostly that I am not as good a constructor as others. When "unusual" (i.e. bad) fill shows up in my grids, it's usually because I was unable to fill the grid smoothly given the constraints I made for myself with the meta content. Whether that's a feature or a bug I guess depends on your point of view ...
- Al Sisti
- Posts: 2135
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:28 pm
- Location: Whitesboro NY
I see nothing wrong with learning new words every day. I think by now I know pretty much all I need to know about NENE, ENO, AMES, ONO and UMA.pgw wrote: ↑Wed Apr 22, 2020 12:10 pmNot for me - I have no idea how anyone can possibly construct a good themeless. The constraints created by theme, or meta content, require creativity in filling the rest of the grid; a blank slate would be incredibly intimidating to me.
The reason for this is mostly that I am not as good a constructor as others. When "unusual" (i.e. bad) fill shows up in my grids, it's usually because I was unable to fill the grid smoothly given the constraints I made for myself with the meta content. Whether that's a feature or a bug I guess depends on your point of view ...
- Al Sisti
- Posts: 2135
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:28 pm
- Location: Whitesboro NY
- FrankieHeck
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:57 pm
- Location: West Virginia
I'm about to have a LOSING streak with PGW. And I don't think I'm going to get Brian's latest, either. I don't know if I'm getting dumber or if I've just been too distracted lately. On the plus side (is it a plus? I'm not sure...) I'm getting better at failing these. In the sense that I don't let it bug me all weekend. I guess maybe that's WHY I'm not getting them....
- Al Sisti
- Posts: 2135
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:28 pm
- Location: Whitesboro NY
Brian's is tough, but worth it... and very clever. Peter's is not super difficult, but I was going further than necessary and making it harder and unintentionally impossible.FrankieHeck wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2020 6:13 pm I'm about to have a LOSING streak with PGW. And I don't think I'm going to get Brian's latest, either. I don't know if I'm getting dumber or if I've just been too distracted lately. On the plus side (is it a plus? I'm not sure...) I'm getting better at failing these. In the sense that I don't let it bug me all weekend. I guess maybe that's WHY I'm not getting them....
- FrankieHeck
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:57 pm
- Location: West Virginia
Thanks. Now it's going to bug me all weekend! I did break down and print Peter's out...I've been trying to save on ink. But I think I'll switch gears and try Brian's again.Al Sisti wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2020 7:49 pmBrian's is tough, but worth it... and very clever. Peter's is not super difficult, but I was going further than necessary and making it harder and unintentionally impossible.FrankieHeck wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2020 6:13 pm I'm about to have a LOSING streak with PGW. And I don't think I'm going to get Brian's latest, either. I don't know if I'm getting dumber or if I've just been too distracted lately. On the plus side (is it a plus? I'm not sure...) I'm getting better at failing these. In the sense that I don't let it bug me all weekend. I guess maybe that's WHY I'm not getting them....
Edited to add: Doh. Solved Brian's. I will say more about that after the reveal, lol.
- camandsampowercouple
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2020 2:58 am
-
- Posts: 1739
- Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2019 10:09 am
Same. I saw absolutely nothing pointing at anything and know about three words of French so I tossed it. Only 4 days until WSJ!camandsampowercouple wrote: ↑Sun Apr 26, 2020 7:18 am just solved the grid and im intimidated by the language barrier
-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2019 8:15 pm
This is very late, but if I'm right the puzzle is very gettable so don't let the French intimidate you
-
- Posts: 1739
- Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2019 10:09 am
Thanks. I took another look today and still nothing. Tossed.
- camandsampowercouple
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2020 2:58 am
I think I just pulled it together but maybe i feel like I only have like half of it...