“Need a Lift” - new WSJ variety puzzle
- DavyGravy
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:32 pm
- Location: Webster, New York
“Need a Lift” - new WSJ variety puzzle
Paul Hunsberger gets the first post HEX WSJ variety cryptic. Congratulations Paul! Big shoes to fill. I can’t wait to tackle it!
If I’ve solved and you need a nudge, you can PM me. Happy to pay it forward.
- oldjudge
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2019 4:16 am
- Location: Pasadena, CA
- Meg
- Posts: 2293
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 1:41 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL
I just kept plugging away and everything became clear…….eventually. Some delayed gratification here.
Check out and support http://CrosswordsForCancer.com.
-
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2020 7:38 pm
- Location: Iowa
-
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2019 5:12 pm
I was worried when I saw the puzzle was not a Cox - Rathvon puzzle. I should not have been. This was a great cryptic crossword that took me a long time to finish. I am in awe of the creators of puzzles like these
-
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 1:16 pm
- Location: New Richmond ohio
Stuck on 6d and 32a.. eventually I’ll get it. Different creator makes it more difficult. But a good puzzle for the dreary night…. Never mind. Got it all. Great puzzle!
- ChrisKochmanski
- Posts: 2400
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:51 pm
- Location: Saline, Michigan
Paul H. produces a variety cryptic masterpiece in his first WSJ outing! I’ll bet Cox and Rathvon are pleased to see it.
- Richard B.
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Sat May 16, 2020 1:58 pm
- Location: upper west side, NYC
It would be great to see these every 4 weeks in rotation like before. Welcome Paul H!
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2019 2:51 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
I agree with all the previous comments, particularly Jeanrosz’, regarding 6D and 32D taking the longest to solve (and 6D being the last.)
While I prefer puzzles in which confirming that you’ve understood the instructions, is not the biggest challenge, I, too, found the puzzle to be challenging, and satisfying when solved. Although adding the element of determining the identity of the “helpful person” seemed superfluous at first, it did offer an additional check in the end (and a relevant word choice, at that. Actually, one might say a HEX-ian choice.)
While I prefer puzzles in which confirming that you’ve understood the instructions, is not the biggest challenge, I, too, found the puzzle to be challenging, and satisfying when solved. Although adding the element of determining the identity of the “helpful person” seemed superfluous at first, it did offer an additional check in the end (and a relevant word choice, at that. Actually, one might say a HEX-ian choice.)
- DCBilly
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2021 4:40 pm
- Location: Washington DC
I enjoyed the challenge. I thought the instructions feature of being meaningless without puzzle progress was Hex-ian.
- KayW
- Moderator
- Posts: 4021
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 12:10 am
- Location: Chicago
A lovely WSJ debut from Paul Hunsberger. It took me ages to figure out what to do, but solving this one sure did give me a lift. And to think I was worried about the quality of the post-HEX cryptic puzzles.
Contest Crosswords Combating Cancer (CCCC) is a bundle of 16 metapuzzles created to help raise money for cancer-related charities. It is available at CrosswordsForCancer.com.
- iggystan
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2021 5:39 pm
Wow, this one was fun. Took me a bit to get where the puzzle was going, but once I did it all fell into place. Excellent puzzle, Paul H.
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2020 1:08 pm
- Location: Annapolis, Maryland
I was not familiar with this setter but I’m very pleased to make his acquaintance! The puzzle was clever and fun with great payoffs on completion. Here’s hoping we see much more of Mr. Hunsberger in the future.
- BarbaraK
- Posts: 2769
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 2:37 pm
- Location: Virginia
I got stuck with the grid about half done. A comment on the WSJ site told me why, and I managed to finish. As a mediocre cryptic solver, don’t think I’d ever have figured it out on my own.
Still don’t understand the cryptic part of the clue for 3D. If anyone would care to explain in a PM, I’d appreciate it.
Still don’t understand the cryptic part of the clue for 3D. If anyone would care to explain in a PM, I’d appreciate it.
If you want help with a meta, feel free to PM me. The more specific you are about what you have and what you want, the more likely I can help without spoiling.
(And if I help you win a mug, I’ll be especially delighted.)
(And if I help you win a mug, I’ll be especially delighted.)
- KayW
- Moderator
- Posts: 4021
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 12:10 am
- Location: Chicago
I think behind a tag is acceptable here. My interpretation.BarbaraK wrote: ↑Sun Jan 14, 2024 3:41 pm I got stuck with the grid about half done. A comment on the WSJ site told me why, and I managed to finish. As a mediocre cryptic solver, don’t think I’d ever have figured it out on my own.
Still don’t understand the cryptic part of the clue for 3D. If anyone would care to explain in a PM, I’d appreciate it.
Contest Crosswords Combating Cancer (CCCC) is a bundle of 16 metapuzzles created to help raise money for cancer-related charities. It is available at CrosswordsForCancer.com.
- BarbaraK
- Posts: 2769
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 2:37 pm
- Location: Virginia
Oh, thank you! Had most of that but was missing one piece.KayW wrote: ↑Sun Jan 14, 2024 4:01 pmI think behind a tag is acceptable here. My interpretation.BarbaraK wrote: ↑Sun Jan 14, 2024 3:41 pm I got stuck with the grid about half done. A comment on the WSJ site told me why, and I managed to finish. As a mediocre cryptic solver, don’t think I’d ever have figured it out on my own.
Still don’t understand the cryptic part of the clue for 3D. If anyone would care to explain in a PM, I’d appreciate it.
If you want help with a meta, feel free to PM me. The more specific you are about what you have and what you want, the more likely I can help without spoiling.
(And if I help you win a mug, I’ll be especially delighted.)
(And if I help you win a mug, I’ll be especially delighted.)