#55 - "That Sounds Different"

Creative and challenging meta crosswords (currently on hiatus) from: www.pgwcc.net
User avatar
hcbirker
Posts: 1985
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:24 pm
Location: Studio City, CA

#21

Post by hcbirker »

After a fail, I finally saw it. Got side tracked by something I saw that I couldn't let go of. At least I finally got it!
Heidi
User avatar
TPS
Posts: 721
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:19 pm
Location: Florida

#22

Post by TPS »

Apparently I am way too stupid to do this one.
User avatar
ky-mike
Posts: 1942
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:22 pm
Location: Near Louisville Ky

#23

Post by ky-mike »

Don't beat yourself up over this one. Set it aside and come back with fresh eyes tomorrow. If you have marked up your puzzle, print out a fresh copy and fill it in again using your completed grid. Sometimes that helps you to see something that you missed while focused on the grid answers.

PGW's puzzles are often way out of my league. I started keeping track of my completion % this year on WSJ, PGW and MG. I have an 8 puzzle gap where I just couldn't get on the same page as PGW. I have done much better on the other puzzles.

Good Luck.
User avatar
TPS
Posts: 721
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:19 pm
Location: Florida

#24

Post by TPS »

No, I am definitely just not smart enough to do this one - I was given a hint that led me to the method - I'm just so dumb I don't know how to apply the method! That is public school and Scottish/Welsh genes for ya!
User avatar
hcbirker
Posts: 1985
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:24 pm
Location: Studio City, CA

#25

Post by hcbirker »

TPS wrote: Wed Apr 08, 2020 7:09 pm No, I am definitely just not smart enough to do this one - I was given a hint that led me to the method - I'm just so dumb I don't know how to apply the method! That is public school and Scottish/Welsh genes for ya!
It took me awhile. You are definitely smart enough! This one is a little tricky.
Heidi
User avatar
anjhinz
Posts: 123
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2019 11:35 am
Location: Dallas, TX

#26

Post by anjhinz »

Really loved this one! I did the hard version but feel like I got lucky early on
LesY
Posts: 678
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 4:21 pm

#27

Post by LesY »

I think I got it. Wanted the last step to work a different way, but it led to gibberish, which is always pretty much always wrong. :) The answer I landed on was far more elegant and appropriate.
User avatar
boharr
Moderator
Posts: 3182
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 8:57 am
Location: Westchester, NY

#28

Post by boharr »

Solved, with (aghast!) nudges.
User avatar
TMart
Posts: 816
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:13 am
Location: Malvern, PA

#29

Post by TMart »

Got it. I did the hard version, and wasn't so sure of my answer when I submitted, but Peter confirmed it. Good one, and nicely constructed.

Now what to do until 4 PM when WSJ is supposed to come out? I guess I'll keep looking for that red herring.
User avatar
TPS
Posts: 721
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:19 pm
Location: Florida

#30

Post by TPS »

Well putting it away and not looking at it for half a day didn't help. So it is definitely me just being a moron. I'm not eve sure I will understand it when the solution comes out - I really don't even understand how one would get from the hard version to the easy version - i.e. how one would have found some of those clues because some of them aren't related at all.
User avatar
Al Sisti
Posts: 2037
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:28 pm
Location: Whitesboro NY

#31

Post by Al Sisti »

TPS wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2020 3:01 pm Well putting it away and not looking at it for half a day didn't help. So it is definitely me just being a moron. I'm not eve sure I will understand it when the solution comes out - I really don't even understand how one would get from the hard version to the easy version - i.e. how one would have found some of those clues because some of them aren't related at all.
Don't be so harsh on yourself... PGWCC metas are harder, on average, than the other metas we usually see. Hang in there!
LesY
Posts: 678
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 4:21 pm

#32

Post by LesY »

Al Sisti wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2020 3:06 pm
TPS wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2020 3:01 pm Well putting it away and not looking at it for half a day didn't help. So it is definitely me just being a moron. I'm not eve sure I will understand it when the solution comes out - I really don't even understand how one would get from the hard version to the easy version - i.e. how one would have found some of those clues because some of them aren't related at all.
Don't be so harsh on yourself... PGWCC metas are harder, on average, than the other metas we usually see. Hang in there!
Agree with Al. Keep trying - it takes time and Peter's puzzles are rarely simple. I remember the days when I had no idea - and I remember exactly where I was when I tried to solve my first one - I was clueless! I didn't even understand the answer when I read it on Monday (WSJ).

I have to say with this one, I did the "hard" version, then after I was finished I looked at the "easy" version. It's hard to know how I would have experienced the easy one if I saw that first, but I'm not sure it would have been all that easy. We'll never know I guess.
FKelly
Posts: 315
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:09 pm

#33

Post by FKelly »

TPS wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2020 3:01 pm So it is definitely me just being a moron.
Not really. It's not that 'the rules are … there are no rules'. Metas are like tax law. The rules are not fixed, they change. Solvers would like them to be fixed, but the constructors make up the rules as they go. PGW takes this to an extreme sometimes.
pgw
Posts: 90
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 5:24 pm

#34

Post by pgw »

FKelly wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2020 4:21 pm Not really. It's not that 'the rules are … there are no rules'. Metas are like tax law. The rules are not fixed, they change. Solvers would like them to be fixed, but the constructors make up the rules as they go. PGW takes this to an extreme sometimes.
I won't go into a whole treatise on my theory of metapuzzles here, but as an avid metapuzzle solver myself, I don't agree with the part I've bolded above. If the "rules" (not really the right term IMO) were the same from puzzle to puzzle, they'd stop being puzzles.
burak
Posts: 246
Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2019 8:15 pm

#35

Post by burak »

Because I opened it this morning I directly went to the easy version, and I'm glad I did. I don't think I would have ever gotten the hard version. Loved the idea, very nice.

One thing I realized with PGW metas is that the difficulty of the grid was holding me back because I got obsessed with filling it out without Googling (I have weird crossword-solving rules: I also hate it when people ask for a nudge on a meta, which is absurd because a forum is where you discuss things and ask for help, but maybe I'll change one day) Anyway, that effort cost me valuable time and mental resolve, and I think PGW grids are just impossible to finish unlike the other metas we cover here. So a couple puzzles ago I admitted defeat and stopped doing that, and guess what, it's fine. I enjoy PGW metas more now :)
CPKdad
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2020 7:56 pm

#36

Post by CPKdad »

So after having tried Peter's for the last 3-4 weeks and not solved any, I was ready to give up. I downloaded the "hard" grid and solved the meta in just a few minutes after filling the grid. I'm on a mini-streak, having done this, the WSJ and the MG over the weekend. Chances are I won't be able to solve any more metas for the rest of the year!
User avatar
Beth Tyrpin
Posts: 512
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:11 pm

#37

Post by Beth Tyrpin »

Here’s my wrong answer. Thinking the crossing letters of each set must provide the meta letters I submitted Hyena. Reading from left to right we have H-I-N-E-H. Split that into Hi=Hy, N=en, and eh=long A giving us (ok only me) Hyena. Hyenas do sound different.
Thanks for letting me know I was wrong so I could find the correct answer.
Locked