"2+2=5" - February 28, 2020
- MajordomoTom
- Posts: 1408
- Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2019 12:09 am
- Location: St. Louis, MO
one deep rabbit hole (empty warren):
look at the letters of QUEEN and ESQUE
and there are SOOOO many QUs and COs in the grid, that made me want to find double letters
but, as much as I tried, could not find double letters in SEARCHOUT, so I knew that wasn't the answer
I just kept putting it aside to (a) work on taxes and (b) work on Sweet 16 until ... it just gelled for me. QUANT and COCOA were a big part of it, the word SEOUL in the grid was staring at me and when I realized it worked with SEARCHOUT, I was ... done.
look at the letters of QUEEN and ESQUE
and there are SOOOO many QUs and COs in the grid, that made me want to find double letters
but, as much as I tried, could not find double letters in SEARCHOUT, so I knew that wasn't the answer
I just kept putting it aside to (a) work on taxes and (b) work on Sweet 16 until ... it just gelled for me. QUANT and COCOA were a big part of it, the word SEOUL in the grid was staring at me and when I realized it worked with SEARCHOUT, I was ... done.
"Lots of planets have a North", the Ninth Doctor.
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2019 11:11 pm
Like the Commodore, I "Muddled" instead of "Muggled" for a while, though eventually found the way the way to shore. I quickly discarded the ridiculous and unGaffneyesque "QAGSEACCSO" and latched onto QUANT, GUSTO, COCOA and SEOUL as five letter grid answers that used letters from four of the five entries. However the first five letter answer I identified for EXPENSE ACCOUNTS, was STOIC. This led to TOIAL. . . so close to TOTAL, I even thought to myself, "If the I were a T, TOTAL would be a good answer." Then I found additional 5 letter entries that could be spelled with the letters from EXPENSE ACCOUNT so discarded this approach without seeing that it was really the first two letters of each of the two words in the long entries that would lead to the meta answer.MaineMarge wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 9:26 am Luckily I zeroed in on the 5 in the title indicating to look at the 5 letter grid answers
Additional muddling produced "DISCOB" (a detour using three letter grid answers and "NOOSE PECAN" (using matched pairs of across/down five letter grid answers).
Last edited by juliet on Mon Mar 02, 2020 9:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Eric Porter
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Sun May 05, 2019 2:19 am
- Location: Nashville, TN
While I got it quickly, I can see how some people got stuck. It took me days to see the answer to "Two By Two" for example, but my struggle on that one helped me see this one faster.
When I didn't see any hidden words in the theme answers, I wrote out the first letters to the left of the puzzle (QA, GS, EA, CC, SO). I thought that these probably were contained in a 5 letter answer and I quickly found out that it was always the first and third. When I looked at COCOA I realized the pattern.
I haven't seen anyone else describe solving it in these two steps.
When I didn't see any hidden words in the theme answers, I wrote out the first letters to the left of the puzzle (QA, GS, EA, CC, SO). I thought that these probably were contained in a 5 letter answer and I quickly found out that it was always the first and third. When I looked at COCOA I realized the pattern.
I haven't seen anyone else describe solving it in these two steps.
-
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2019 6:46 pm
Well I tried doing 27 of these meta puzzles before getting one right. Slow learner I guess. But this one jumped out at me mainly because of queen Anne and quant being on the same line. I saw the qu and the an and the quant and then quickly found the rest. I don't know why some answers are easy to see for one person and not the next. Certainly I have not found the right answer on many other puzzles that everyone else seemed to find easy!!
- Bob cruise director
- Cruise Director
- Posts: 4543
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:38 pm
- Location: Any golf course within 500 miles of Littleton MA
When you figure out why you get some hard ones easily and miss some easy ones, please let the rest of us know.Nlobb wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 3:49 pm Well I tried doing 27 of these meta puzzles before getting one right. Slow learner I guess. But this one jumped out at me mainly because of queen Anne and quant being on the same line. I saw the qu and the an and the quant and then quickly found the rest. I don't know why some answers are easy to see for one person and not the next. Certainly I have not found the right answer on many other puzzles that everyone else seemed to find easy!!
Bob Stevens
Cruise Director
Cruise Director
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 2:46 pm
Greetings, we are still waiting to confirm a winner, but we can share some stats. 1100 entries precisely. 82% correct. A very wide range of incorrect answers including EQUATION (18), QUOTIENT (13), EXPONENT (11), EQUAL (10), COSINE (6), and COUNT (6) among many others.
Stay tuned...
Stay tuned...
-
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2019 6:46 pm
- Scott M
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 1:10 pm
- Location: Charlottesville, VA
SEARCHOUT and XOUTS had me going in the wrong direction for far too long, exacerbated by the unusually high number of U's in the puzzle, which led to a number of "OUT's" in various configurations throughout the puzzle. Never recovered from there.
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
Mark Twain
Mark Twain
- Bob cruise director
- Cruise Director
- Posts: 4543
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:38 pm
- Location: Any golf course within 500 miles of Littleton MA
I went that way for a long time looking for hidden letters in OUT combinations. Like ouSt, ouNt, XoutS, ouS, Hout, but just another dead end rabbit hole.Scott Medvetz wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 7:30 pm SEARCHOUT and XOUTS had me going in the wrong direction for far too long, exacerbated by the unusually high number of U's in the puzzle, which led to a number of "OUT's" in various configurations throughout the puzzle. Never recovered from there.
then there was the abnormally high number of double letters, EE, NN, CC, MM, double ST. And the three time instance of SEA.
Bob Stevens
Cruise Director
Cruise Director
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 2:46 pm
- DrTom
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2019 6:46 pm
- Location: Jacksonville, FL
I got this one by looking at it long enough and finally saying, "hey QU and QU so close together has got to mean something" and it did, Once I got the EXAC the path home and AHA became crystal clear. However, I was almost led astray by the EE CC and MM in the long answers. My desperately seeking justification brain said ...EE MM CC two of each while searching out the meaning of the universe and the most famous of all equations E=MC squared. I was sooo ready to submit equation and then the "wow that's a stretch Tom" and then I saw the QUs. I was almost TOTALly fooled,
NUDGES!I am always willing to give nudges where needed; metas should be about fun, not frustration. Send me what you have done so far because often you are closer than you think!
- BarbaraK
- Posts: 2612
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 2:37 pm
- Location: Virginia
Looks like the post-enlightenment thing works for you too. Post that the winner hasn’t confirmed yet, and the email appears.MikeMillerwsj wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 8:24 pm And now congrats to the winner: Ron Hanovice of Plymouth, Mass.!
- Bob cruise director
- Cruise Director
- Posts: 4543
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:38 pm
- Location: Any golf course within 500 miles of Littleton MA
GreatBarbaraK wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 10:18 pmLooks like the post-enlightenment thing works for you too. Post that the winner hasn’t confirmed yet, and the email appears.MikeMillerwsj wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 8:24 pm And now congrats to the winner: Ron Hanovice of Plymouth, Mass.!
Now all we have to do is move about 80 miles up Interstate 495
Bob Stevens
Cruise Director
Cruise Director
- Colin
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:57 pm
Genius puzzle - just by the number of decoys!
One world. One planet. One future.
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2019 12:18 am
- Location: Pasadena, CA
Yes. For example 2.3 + 2.3 = 4.6, rounding off gives you 2 + 2 = 5.Bird Lives wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2020 10:41 pm The tile is correct: two plus two equal five . . . for very large values of two.
- DrTom
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2019 6:46 pm
- Location: Jacksonville, FL
Well heck then, for VERY large values of 2, 2+2=6 (2.9+2.9=5.8) and that would have never worked, I'd still be lookingBill Bovard wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 10:21 pmYes. For example 2.3 + 2.3 = 4.6, rounding off gives you 2 + 2 = 5.Bird Lives wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2020 10:41 pm The tile is correct: two plus two equal five . . . for very large values of two.
NUDGES!I am always willing to give nudges where needed; metas should be about fun, not frustration. Send me what you have done so far because often you are closer than you think!
- DBMiller
- Posts: 545
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 8:59 pm
- Location: New Hampshire
Bill Bovard wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 10:21 pmYes. For example 2.3 + 2.3 = 4.6, rounding off gives you 2 + 2 = 5.Bird Lives wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2020 10:41 pm The tile is correct: two plus two equal five . . . for very large values of two.
If I'm around, I am willing to join the Muggle Zoom room at other times to lend a hand to those in need.