#603 - "Go On In!"

An excellent puzzle written by one of the innovators of the meta crossword format. It comes out every Friday at noon and increases in difficulty throughout the month. Available for modest subscription (worth every cent) here: www.xwordcontest.com
User avatar
Hector
Posts: 1297
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:15 pm
Location: San Francisco
Contact:

#21

Post by Hector »

Having spent my free time since Friday working on a neat puzzle about socks over at fivethirtyeight.com, I returned to this one this morning, and got on in. Nice meta! A distraction or two in the grid, whether intentional or not I don't know.

Edit: (BTW, I've nudged CrossedPurposes, tonyrobots, and damefox)
Last edited by Hector on Sun Dec 22, 2019 4:02 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
tonyrobots
Posts: 149
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 1:48 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon
Contact:

#22

Post by tonyrobots »

Hi all, I'm new here and hoping to keep my little 2 puzzle streak going! Could I possibly get a nudge as well? Just hoping to get a foothold. Appreciate it! Very excited to be a part of the community here.
damefox
Posts: 477
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2019 2:18 pm

#23

Post by damefox »

Hector wrote: Sun Dec 22, 2019 1:15 pm Having spent my free time since Friday working on a neat puzzle about socks over at fivethirtyeight.com, I returned to this one this morning, and got on in. Nice meta! A distraction or two in the grid, whether intentional or not I don't know.

Edit: (BTW, I've nudged CrossedPurposes and tonyrobots)
Would you mind assisting me as well? :D
User avatar
Thurman8er
Posts: 393
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 3:05 pm
Location: Fresno, CA

#24

Post by Thurman8er »

For some reason this took me about five or ten minutes to get. Odd for a Week 3 (especially for me).
User avatar
tonyrobots
Posts: 149
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 1:48 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon
Contact:

#25

Post by tonyrobots »

Got it! Thanks for the little nudge, Hector. Very satisfying, even with a hint. I think I'm hooked :)
damefox
Posts: 477
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2019 2:18 pm

#26

Post by damefox »

Got it (also with a little help). Oddly what would've been my hail mary guess ended up being correct, which to me makes this a little unsatisfying. I seem to be in the minority though.
User avatar
ChrisKochmanski
Posts: 2158
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:51 pm
Location: Saline, Michigan

#27

Post by ChrisKochmanski »

Whew! Got it, but I needed a nudge -- more like a couple -- from another solver. Fun, even though I needed the help. Interesting too that it would have been possible for me to work backwards to the solution, if I had followed an inkling I had early on.
User avatar
oldjudge
Posts: 1624
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2019 4:16 am
Location: Pasadena, CA

#28

Post by oldjudge »

I’ve put this puzzle down and picked it up a few times with no success. If nudges are available I guess I could use one too. Thank you!
CrossedPurposes
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2019 10:12 am

#29

Post by CrossedPurposes »

Thanks for the nudge, Hector. I'm in the same boat as damefox - would have been my hail Mary as well. Still fun to puzzle out. I've nudged oldjudge.
User avatar
hcbirker
Posts: 1985
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:24 pm
Location: Studio City, CA

#30

Post by hcbirker »

Well well well. Beam me up!
Heidi
User avatar
BrianMac
Site Admin
Posts: 787
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2019 11:45 pm
Location: Connecticut

#31

Post by BrianMac »

tonyrobots wrote: Sun Dec 22, 2019 1:55 pm Hi all, I'm new here and hoping to keep my little 2 puzzle streak going! Could I possibly get a nudge as well? Just hoping to get a foothold. Appreciate it! Very excited to be a part of the community here.
G-Force! Welcome to the forums. Love your avatar. I suspect you had no trouble with the WSJ puzzle two weeks ago, whose answer was WONDER TWINS. :D
User avatar
Streroto
Posts: 772
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2019 4:24 pm
Location: Newtown Square, PA

#32

Post by Streroto »

I’ll take a nudge if anyone is offering. It has beaten me so far.
User avatar
ky-mike
Posts: 1943
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:22 pm
Location: Near Louisville Ky

#33

Post by ky-mike »

Streroto wrote: Mon Dec 23, 2019 12:41 pm I’ll take a nudge if anyone is offering. It has beaten me so far.
Likewise. Thanks.
User avatar
sharkicicles
Posts: 798
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 12:03 pm
Location: Chicago

#34

Post by sharkicicles »

Finally got around to looking at this and, wow, I’m not even sure what the theme of the puzzle is yet, much less what to change.

Happy holidays to everyone!
User avatar
David R
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:34 pm

#35

Post by David R »

Got it, looking it over a second time on a different day seems to do the trick on harder ones.
damefox
Posts: 477
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2019 2:18 pm

#36

Post by damefox »

Solution is up on Crossword Fiend. I do like the idea of this puzzle, but I had a couple quibbles with it. 1) Clearly having pairs of clues with the same pair of numbers was just intended to be confusing, except that by an annoying coincidence the one without a pair is that one that you needed to make a new word for, which suggests that the other pairs are related even though they're not. Since Matt has said in the past he doesn't usually put intentional red herrings in his puzzles, this feels out of character and not a week 3 move. Maybe more appropriate for a week 4 or 5. 2) As I said above, my hail mary guess turned out to be correct. I landed on ROCH -> RICH for the sole reason that ROCH is a very weird word to have in a puzzle when RICH would work. If you're going to make a puzzle where the meta involves changing one letter, the puzzle needs to be equally clean before and after the change. Having an obviously obscure word means that backsolving is too easy. But that said, the idea is clever, and it's cute that O -> I is also the change from ON -> IN, so it works with the theme in multiple ways.
User avatar
Streroto
Posts: 772
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2019 4:24 pm
Location: Newtown Square, PA

#37

Post by Streroto »

I too got it right without any clue as to how to get there. My nudge did not get me anywhere, alas! Looking at the solution I would never have figured it out even if I had months or years to do so. Week 3?? Yikes. Hopefully Matt declares this a week 4 and goes easy on us Friday. Happy holidays all!!
Laura M
Posts: 1384
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:49 am

#38

Post by Laura M »

damefox wrote: Tue Dec 24, 2019 12:47 pm [...]
If you're going to make a puzzle where the meta involves changing one letter, the puzzle needs to be equally clean before and after the change. Having an obviously obscure word means that backsolving is too easy. But that said, the idea is clever, and it's cute that O -> I is also the change from ON -> IN, so it works with the theme in multiple ways.
I didn't realize the O->I thing until some time after I submitted; I was already impressed with this one but that added an extra level of elegance in my opinion! I agree that ROCH is clunky but I still probably wouldn't have guessed the change without figuring the rest of it out, I'm too used to seeing weird/unfamiliar words in crosswords :-)
User avatar
Hector
Posts: 1297
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:15 pm
Location: San Francisco
Contact:

#39

Post by Hector »

Right, if it was pgw, I'd think quite possibly he was trying to educate, but it did seem unusual for Matt. Also (on the) LOOSE and (on the) HEAD seemed distracting.
User avatar
TMart
Posts: 816
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:13 am
Location: Malvern, PA

#40

Post by TMart »

Never got to finish this due to holiday festivities, but saw ROCH/STROKE to RICH/STRIKE early on as the only possible letter switch that made sense both across and down, with no idea as to the method of getting there. Never sent it - oh well.
Locked