Re: "Squeeze Play" - September 6, 2019
Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 5:39 pm
I'm guessing a birthday in '61 won't carry much weight in the mug selection process!
A place to discuss the WSJ Weekly Crossword Contest and other "meta"-style crosswords
https://www.xword-muggles.com/
A squeeze play involves a bunt, but I don’t think there’s anything in the grid or clues to support BUNT as the meta.MikeMillerwsj wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2019 6:03 pm Hello Muggles, we are still waiting to hear back from our winner. Meanwhile here's a brief report: 1018 entries. about 60% correct, significantly lower than usual. 288 votes for BUNT--a huge number for an incorrect answer. (And just a guess, right? Or is there a clever path to BUNT?) Stay tuned...
Thank you for the advice and links, which I will read and watch with interest. However, I have no interest to actually construct crosswords... just curious how so many deliberate rabbit holes can be squeezed into the mine field that was this week’s puzzle!Bird Lives wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2019 11:17 amThe hard part is coming up with the idea for the meta, and I'm not sure that this process can be systematized for purposes of an instructional video. But maybe it can. Filling in the grid is the easy part, especially now with Internet resources.GlennG wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:54 amIt's like any other crossword puzzle. As a constructor you start in a blank grid by laying out the results you want (the theme entries or whatever else you want to be sure that exists in the grid, in this case the diamond and "MARIS"), and then develop whatever else that goes in the grid so it fits and follows the typical Farrar rule set.
There's no need for Mike and Matt to add to the numerous resources already out there that generically describe how a crossword is made. You can buy books aimed at teaching you how to do it (Patrick Berry's work is almost the go-to). Generically, the New York Times did a set of articles. And then Wired put out a video generically describing it. I'm pretty sure there's lots more out there.
BUNT was my first random guess, but I eventually got to CRAM. The BUTT and AUNTS answers had me going for awhile.MikeMillerwsj wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2019 6:03 pm Hello Muggles, we are still waiting to hear back from our winner. Meanwhile here's a brief report: 1018 entries. about 60% correct, significantly lower than usual. 288 votes for BUNT--a huge number for an incorrect answer. (And just a guess, right? Or is there a clever path to BUNT?) Stay tuned...
I also spent way too long looking for verbs made of letters at 1st, 2nd, 3rd & home of diamonds starting at 61, and any other diamonds that might be "squeeze"d tighter. Finally saw the diagonal Cubs running the base path and made it home from there.Al Sisti wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2019 12:46 am I got CRAM pretty quickly and sent it in... however, I noticed after I submitted that I had circled the "straight line" occurrence of ROYALS, as opposed to the "bent" one that he used, actually forming a nice diamond. My first thought was "well, ROYALS is ROYALS, whichever one I choose. But then I panicked... yes, CRAM is a verb formed by the start of each team name (whichever ROYALS we circled)... but what if the verb Mike actually intended for us to find used the letters at first base, second base, third base and home? GAA!! I checked quickly -- twice -- and fortunately, it didn't spell a verb... but I thought for sure he got me again in my haste.
I don't know about a clever path to BUNT, but did you get any votes for SLOG? If you think of the whole grid as the suggested "baseball diamond," then the corners are the bases, containing the letters L, G, O, and S, which anagram to SLOG. This was actually my first guess, but it didn't seem quite clean enough to me, so I kept looking and finally saw the path to CRAM. Before I realized the diagonals of the diamond in the middle were names of baseball teams though, I just looked at the corners, which are C, O, A, and S, which fortunately don't anagram to a four-letter verb, otherwise that would've been my guess and I never would've seen the team names on the diagonals.MikeMillerwsj wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2019 6:03 pm Hello Muggles, we are still waiting to hear back from our winner. Meanwhile here's a brief report: 1018 entries. about 60% correct, significantly lower than usual. 288 votes for BUNT--a huge number for an incorrect answer. (And just a guess, right? Or is there a clever path to BUNT?) Stay tuned...
Mike Miller Staff
8 hours ago
And now congratulations to this week's winner: Fred Stewart of San Antonio, Tex.!